Legal Opinion

Whitzman v. Hirsh

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 20, 1889PublishedCited by 3 opinions

EROM SHELBY. Appeal from Chancery Court of Shelby County. B. M. Estes, Ch.

1Opinion of the CourtFolkes, J.

This is a bill by a vendee against a remote warrantor to recover damages for a breach of the covenant of general warranty contained in a deed.

The caíase was heard upon an agreed statement of facts, from which it appears that defendant Hirsh, on Jnly 19, 1870, for the consideration of $2,700 then paid him, conveyed in fee, with general covenants of warranty, a certain tract of land to one Morris Kuehn; that on September 8, 1870, said Kuehn, by a duly registered plat, made a sub-division of said tract into twenty-six lots of equal size and value, numbering same from one to twenty-six inclusive;…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hollingsworth v. MexiaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1896
  2. Brooks v. BlackMississippi Supreme Court · 1890
  3. King v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API