State v. Lloyd
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtO’Connor, C.J.
{¶ 1} In this appeal, we explain the analysis that a court must undertake in determining (1) whether an out-of-state conviction is a sexually oriented offense that triggers a duty to register in Ohio and (2) the sanction for failure to register in Ohio based on a duty that arises from an out-of-state conviction. For the reasons explained herein, we hold that the offense for which appellant Wesley Lloyd was convicted in Texas, aggravated sexual assault, is a sexually oriented offense under Ohio law because it is substantially equivalent to rape, a listed Ohio offense. See R.C. 2950.01(A)(11).…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Perrin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Gonzales v. Duenas-AlvarezSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- State v. BushnerOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
- Denault v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
- State v. BeardOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
- State v. HoehnNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
- State v. McMullenOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.