Legal Opinion

State v. Lloyd

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 2012No. 2011-0212PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connor, C.J.

{¶ 1} In this appeal, we explain the analysis that a court must undertake in determining (1) whether an out-of-state conviction is a sexually oriented offense that triggers a duty to register in Ohio and (2) the sanction for failure to register in Ohio based on a duty that arises from an out-of-state conviction. For the reasons explained herein, we hold that the offense for which appellant Wesley Lloyd was convicted in Texas, aggravated sexual assault, is a sexually oriented offense under Ohio law because it is substantially equivalent to rape, a listed Ohio offense. See R.C. 2950.01(A)(11).…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  3. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  4. Perrin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Gonzales v. Duenas-AlvarezSupreme Court of the United States · 2007

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. State v. BushnerOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
  2. Denault v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  3. State v. BeardOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
  4. State v. HoehnNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  5. State v. McMullenOhio Court of Appeals · 2012

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API