Sheffield v. Sheffield
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Head, Justice.
1. The trial judge charged the jury in part as follows: “I charge you further, gentlemen, that when a copy of a lost or destroyed will is sought to be admitted to probate in lieu of the original will, the presumption is that the original will was not revoked by the testator, and this must be shown by proof.” The propounders, in ground 8 of the amended motion for new trial, assign error on this charge, and the caveators, in ground 5 of their motion, assign error.
This is clearly an erroneous statement of the law. Code § 113-611. The cross-propounders, the defendants in error here,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Burge v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1884
- Lyons v. BloodworthSupreme Court of Georgia · 1945
- Nassau v. SheffieldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1954
3Cited by4 opinions
- Newton v. HigdonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1970
- Tudor v. BradfordSupreme Court of Georgia · 2011
- Jeffrey Dean Wilbur v. Patricia FloydCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2020
- Tudor v. BradfordSupreme Court of Georgia · 2011