Legal Opinion

Tri-City Gas Co. v. Britton

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 18, 1935No. 7 Div. 307PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOULDIN, Justice.

In this cause counsel for appellee, on being reminded by letter from the secretary of this court that no brief was on file for appellee, replied: “There was jury and verdict in the amount of $25.00, and it is immaterial with the appellee whether this case is reversed or not.”

Under general rules of procedure in appellate courts, the appellee interposes a plea to the assignments of error by appellant. The common plea, or joinder in error, in the nature of the general issue, is “hullo est erratum” — “there is no error in the record.” 3 C. J. page 1400, § 1554.

This is declared a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Maddox v. Chilton Warehouse & Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1911

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Department of Industrial Relations v. SavageAlabama Court of Appeals · 1955
  2. McLeod v. WillardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952
  3. United Security Life Insurance v. DupreeAlabama Court of Appeals · 1962
  4. Department of Industrial Relations v. MeeksAlabama Court of Appeals · 1959
  5. Cox v. HunterAlabama Court of Appeals · 1957

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API