Legal Opinion

Clennie H. Saylor v. Roger T. Overberg, Supt.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided September 14, 1979No. 79-3135PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

This appeal has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 9(a), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. After examination of the briefs and record, this panel agrees unanimously that oral argument is not needed. Rule 34(a), Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.

Petitioner appeals from the District Court’s dismissal of his application for a writ of habeas corpus. 28 U.S.C. § 2254. This was petitioner’s second attempt at ha-beas corpus, his first application having been denied by the District Court, with affirmance by this Court and certiorari denied by the Supreme Court of the United…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Thompson v. City of LouisvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. State v. HesterOhio Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Samuel Keener v. L. G. Ridenour, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1979
  5. Henry Speigner v. Arnold R. Jago, SuperintendentCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Booker v. EngleDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1982
  2. Buckley v. DallmanDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1982
  3. Farthing v. ForsheyDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2024
  4. Hawkins v. Warden, Belmont Correctional InstitutionDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2020
  5. John Phillip Witherow v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API