People v. Glass
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. D. M. Delmas, T. C. Coogan, H. C. McPike, and C. W. Cross, for Appellant. U. S. Webb, Attorney-General, W. H. Langdon, District Attorney, Francis J. Heney, Assistant District Attorney, John O’Gara, Assistant District Attorney, and Wm. Hoff Cook, Assistant District Attorney, for Respondent.
1Opinion
Defendant was charged by indictment with the crime of bribery, under section 165 of the Penal Code, and having been convicted of the charge he has appealed to this court from the judgment and the order denying his motion for a new trial. After his conviction, and before judgment was pronounced, the defendant made a motion in arrest of judgment, which was by the court denied. As this motion attacked the sufficiency of the indictment it is proper that the ruling of the court thereon be first considered on this appeal.
The motion was based upon certain defects or alleged defects in the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- People v. . MolineuxNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
- People v. . SharpNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
- People v. CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- People v. CraigCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- People v. IrwinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.