Legal Opinion
Heen & Flint Associates v. Travelers Indemnity Co.
New York Supreme Court
Decided December 8, 1977PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
James H. Boomer, J.
These motions pose a perplexing problem inherent in professional liability insurance coverage written on a "claims made” *3basis. The plaintiffs, partners in an engineering firm, were, since May, 1974, insured by the defendant Travelers Indemnity Company against any damages they might be required to pay as the result of any acts or omissions arising out of their professional services. The first policy was issued for one year and was renewed in 1975 only for the balance of the year, Travelers having notified the plaintiffs that it was not issuing any more…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Samuel N. Zarpas, Inc. v. MorrowDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1963
- Appell v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
- Lehr v. Professional UnderwritersMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
3Cited by14 opinions
- Zuckerman v. National Union Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
- First Alabama Bank Of Montgomery, N.A. v. First State Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Checkrite Ltd., Inc. v. Illinois Nat. Ins. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Egnatz v. Medical Protective Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1991
- Home Insurance Co. of Illinois v. Spectrum Information Technologies, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1996
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.