Legal Opinion

Conklin v. Bush

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 17, 1848PublishedCited by 5 opinions

In error from the Common Pleas of Wayne county. July 10. This was an action of account render by the administrator of Hannah Bush. The first count alleged that the defendants were bailiffs; the second, that there was a tenancy in common, and the defendants received the profits as her bailiffs; the third alleged that she was seised of an undivided third, the profits of which were received by defendants as bailiffs.

Read the full summary

In error from the Common Pleas of Wayne county. July 10. This was an action of account render by the administrator of Hannah Bush. The first count alleged that the defendants were bailiffs; the second, that there was a tenancy in common, and the defendants received the profits as her bailiffs; the third alleged that she was seised of an undivided third, the profits of which were received by defendants as bailiffs. The case was this: — In 1826, S. Bush, the husband of the plaintiff’s intestate, devised all his real estate to her during widowhood. In 1888 he executed a deed conveying to one of…

1Opinion of the CourtCoulter, J.

The deed from Simeon Bush, the elder, to his son Eli C. Bush, and also one from the same to his son James C. Bush, were properly admitted in evidence. Although the deed was not signed by Hannah, the wife of Simeon, and although her acknowledgment before the justice was defective in substance, yet these circumstances were important only as they affected the widow’s right of dower. The deeds on their face were good against Simeon Bush, the elder, and were of controlling effect in this cause, inasmuch as they established the character of the seisin and possession of the defendants, and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sandback v. QuigleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1839

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re Japanese Electronic Products Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
  2. Haines TrustSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co. v. Zenith Radio Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
  4. Peter v. SteelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1801
  5. Bridgeford v. Groh, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API