Legal Opinion
City of Aurora v. West
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided May 15, 1864PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Chief Justice Blade,
in giving the opinion of the Court in that case, says:
“ That which a company is authorized to do by its act of incorporation, it may do; beyond that all its acts are illegal. And the power must be given in plain words or by necessary implication. All powers inot given in this direct and Unmistakable manner are withheld. It ■is strange that the Attorney General, or any body else, should complain against a company that keeps itself within bounds, which are always thus clearly marked; and equally grange that a company which has happened to transgress them should come before…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Blight's Lessee v. RochesterSupreme Court of the United States · 1822
- Watkins v. Lessee of HolmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
- Willison v. WatkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
- Pearce v. Madison & Indianapolis RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1859
- Chapman v. RobertsonNew York Court of Chancery · 1837
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Indiana Tel. Corp. v. Indiana Bell Tel. Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1977