Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Chumney

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 11, 1958No. 19984PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Duckworth, Chief Justice.

1. An order or judgment which merely declares the rights of the parties without an express command or prohibition is not one which may be the basis for a contempt proceeding for the failure to comply therewith. 12 Am. Jur. 406, § 24; Hammock v. Hammock, 209 Ga. 751 (76 S. E. 2d 15). But it is no longer open to question in this State that a valid judgment for alimony may be enforced by attachment for contempt for nonpayment not arising from lack of ability to pay, since the judgment goes further and expressly commands the payment of support, which is a duty in which…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Estes v. EstesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  2. Lewis v. LewisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1888
  3. Goodrum v. GoodrumSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
  4. Allen v. BakerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  5. Hammock v. HammockSupreme Court of Georgia · 1953

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1985
  2. McClain v. McClainSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
  3. Griggers v. BryantSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
  4. Stoner v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977
  5. Fambrough v. CannonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1965

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API