James Stewart & Co. v. National Shawmut Bank of Boston
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
. MORTON, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiff brought suit against the defendant on a written contract. Jurisdiction rests on diversity of citizenship. At the conclusion of the evidence the District Judge ruled that the plaintiff was not entitled to recover, and directed a verdict for the defendant. The plaintiff has appealed.
There is no controversy about the facts. The plaintiff is a construction company engaged in the business of erecting buildings. The defendant is, as its name implies, a national bank. The contract in question was for the erection of a .building by the plaintiff on land owned by…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Duvall v. CraigSupreme Court of the United States · 1817
- Larson v. SylvesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
- Baker v. JamesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
- Carr v. LeahyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
- Philip Carey Co. v. PingreeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hynes v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1980
- First Eastern Bank, N.A. v. JonesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
- Nancy Cantor, Trustee of the Cantor Monson Trust, Debtor v. Wilbraham and Monson AcademyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1979
- Tammaro v. ColarussoMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1980
- Bates v. Atlantic Nat. Bank of JacksonvilleCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1939
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.