Legal Opinion

James Stewart & Co. v. National Shawmut Bank of Boston

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided January 4, 1935No. 2916PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

. MORTON, Circuit Judge.

The plaintiff brought suit against the defendant on a written contract. Jurisdiction rests on diversity of citizenship. At the conclusion of the evidence the District Judge ruled that the plaintiff was not entitled to recover, and directed a verdict for the defendant. The plaintiff has appealed.

There is no controversy about the facts. The plaintiff is a construction company engaged in the business of erecting buildings. The defendant is, as its name implies, a national bank. The contract in question was for the erection of a .building by the plaintiff on land owned by…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Duvall v. CraigSupreme Court of the United States · 1817
  2. Larson v. SylvesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  3. Baker v. JamesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  4. Carr v. LeahyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  5. Philip Carey Co. v. PingreeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hynes v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1980
  2. First Eastern Bank, N.A. v. JonesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
  3. Nancy Cantor, Trustee of the Cantor Monson Trust, Debtor v. Wilbraham and Monson AcademyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1979
  4. Tammaro v. ColarussoMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1980
  5. Bates v. Atlantic Nat. Bank of JacksonvilleCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1939

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API