Legal Opinion

Port Everglades Authority v. Andrews

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 5, 1992No. 92-1764PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Petitioner seeks review of an order denying its motion for recusal of trial judge. Prohibition is the appropriate method for seeking such review. Hayslip v. Douglas, 400 So.2d 553 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981).

Petitioner alleges, among other things, that the judge, at a social gathering prior to trial, made comments to a third party indicating that he may have prejudged the case. This allegation, together with petitioner’s supporting affidavits, sets forth a legally sufficient basis for recusal. Therefore, the trial judge should have granted petitioner’s motion for recusal. See Kasser v. Woodson, 549…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hayslip v. DouglasDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  2. Irwin v. MarkoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  3. Kasser v. WoodsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jones v. Creative World School, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  2. Salazar v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API