Legal Opinion

Motor Service Co. v. Public Utilities Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 2, 1974No. 73-462PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteen, J.

Although Motor Service has assigned several errors to the Public Utilities Commission’s decision, the salient question raised is whether the commission acted reasonably and lawfully in finding compliance* with Item (d) of its 60-day order. We examine the record to ascertain if the commission’s finding is either manifestly against the weight of the evidence, or is not supported by the evidence. Kenton v. Pub. Util. Comm. (1965), 3 Ohio St. 2d 71, 73.

Item (d) of the 60-day order required Morgan to acquire a permanent terminal in Clermont County by construction, purchase, or long-term lease.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. City of Kenton v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Cleveland, Columbus & Cincinnati Highway, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Buchanan v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  4. In re DeSaavedraOhio Public Utilities Commission · 1958

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bryan Truck Line, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Gene's, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Troyer v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API