Legal Opinion

Pollack v. Resnick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 15, 1931Published

1Opinion of the Court

Order adjudging appellant in contempt reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. There was no sufficient direction by the justice at Special Term to the appealing judgment debtor to answer specific questions, and no proper basis was, therefore, laid for contempt proceedings. Furthermore, the order appealed from fails to specify the facts deemed to constitute a contempt of court. (Matter of Price, 78 Misc. 42; Matter of East River Bank v. De Lacy, 37 id. 765; Matter of Shorwitz v. Caminez, 152 App. Div. 758; Matter of Silberman…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Shorwitz v. CaminezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
  2. Price v. Creme De Mohr Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API