Legal Opinion

Hurst v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 3, 2003No. A03A0016PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Andrews, Presiding Judge.

Samorial Lopeze Hurst was found guilty by a jury of two counts of armed robbery. Finding no merit in the claims of error made by Hurst on appeal, we affirm the judgment of conviction.

1. The State produced evidence that Hurst used a handgun to rob two Wendy’s restaurants. A Wendy’s employee testified that on December 13, 1998, Hurst approached the drive-in window where she was working and pointed a handgun at her and demanded money. Hurst then reached inside the window and took over $500 from the cash register. A Wendy’s customer reported the tag number of the car…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Hughes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
  4. Jackson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  5. Bennett v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Strozier v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2003
  2. Tarvin v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2004
  3. Oliver v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  4. Cammer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  5. Rivers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API