Humphrey v. Hezlep
Supreme Court of Minnesota
The affidavit of Henry L. Moss was also used in the hearing of the motion, which corroborated the statements of the Defendant in regard to the ownership of the house and lot occupied by him.
1Opinion of the Court
An order of the District Court vacating and quashing a Warrant of Attachment, is not an appealable order.
This was a motion to dismiss an Appeal to the Supreme Court from an order of the District Court vacating a warrant of Attachment.
The Plaintiff below filed his affidavit for a warrant of Attachment, on the 2d day of September 1854, in the District Court of Ramsey County, setting forth the amount of his claim, causes of action, &c. and that the Defendant had assigned and secreted his property with intent to delay or defraud his creditors, and stated several facts and circumstances upon which…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Davidson v. OwensSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1860