State v. Stephens
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Wedell, J.:
This was a criminal action in which defendant was charged with and convicted of having intoxicating liquor in his possession. On appeal he contends the trial court erred in refusing to grant a continuance and that the evidence did not establish the charge of possession.
*661Concerning the first alleged error defendant contends the county attorney had agreed to a continuance and that the county attorney and not the district court is vested with authority to control continuances in criminal cases. On the record before us the question is not whether…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. MetzSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920
- State v. MunsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1922
- Tripp v. United States Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1935
- Reed-Smith v. LockridgeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
- Peoples National Bank v. DivenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1932
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Stephens v. BertrandSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938
- State v. EarleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1963
- State v. SchumanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940
- Settle v. GlennSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938