State v. Anderson
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtN. Patrick Crooks, J.
¶ 1. TyranN. Anderson seeks review of an unpublished court of appeals deci*590sion affirming his conviction for disorderly conduct,1 contrary to Wis. Stat. § 947.01 (1997-98).2 Anderson contends that his jury trial waiver was both statutorily and constitutionally inadequate because the circuit court and the State failed to affirmatively approve and consent to the waiver, and the circuit court did not engage him in a personal colloquy confirming the written waiver.
¶ 2. We reject Anderson's argument that his jury trial waiver is invalid because the record lacks the required approval of the court…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Singer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- State v. BangertWisconsin Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. KlessigWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. AlbrightWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- State v. WeedWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. GoreSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- People v. SivongxxayCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
- State v. HaukCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2002
- People v. DanielsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.