Legal Opinion

United States v. Guadalupe Rodringuez, Victoriano Lozano Vega, Rolando Garcia and Rene Castillo Tamez

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided August 5, 1974No. 73-2008PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GEE, Circuit Judge:

At the conclusion of their joint trial by jury all four appellants were found guilty as charged for their respective roles in a conspiracy to sell some 106 pounds of marijuana to a federal undercover agent. Specifically, all were found guilty of distributing and possessing with intent to distribute marijuana in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and conspiring to distribute the same in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. In addition, appellants Rodriguez and Vega were convicted of carrying firearms during the commission of a felony in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(2). We affirm…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Edward Morgan MacKenna v. O. B. Ellis, Director, Texas Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960
  3. Thomas Lorenzo Williams v. Dr. George Beto, Director, Texas Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
  4. Joseph L. Thomas v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
  5. Luther James Bradford v. United States of America, Johnny Paul Washam v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Vaughn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  2. Mercado v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  3. United States v. Phillip TroutmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
  4. Ex Parte PriorCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
  5. United States v. Michael AndrewsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API