Legal Opinion

United States v. Hector Mendoza-Oseguera

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 30, 1996No. 93-10656Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

86 F.3d 1164

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

Hector MENDOZA-OSEGUERA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 93-10656.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted April 18, 1996.

Decided May 30, 1996.

Before: FERGUSON, D.W. NELSON, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Smith v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Henderson v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API