Legal Opinion

Carolina Central Railroad v. Wilmington Street Railway Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 15, 1897PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Civil action, beard on complaint and demurrer, before Btarluoh,

1Opinion of the Court

MoNtgomeet, J.:

Upon entering the city of Wilmington, the plaintiff company, before it could lay its track across Fourth street, at a point then within the city limits, was compelled to cut through a considerable embankment, thereby necessitating the building of a bridge over the cut in order that travel and transportation should not be obstructed or delayed over the street. The territory within the city limits and contiguous to the bridge has never been built up, nor have streets been actually laid cff there. The highway which, at the bridge, i? called Fourth street, was the old public road…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hester v. Traction Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  2. Hester v. . Traction Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  3. City of St. Paul v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
  4. Briden v. N. Y., N. H. & H. R. R.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1906
  5. Missouri Pac. Ry. Co. v. City of OmahaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API