Legal Opinion

Dickerson v. City of Spokane

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 17, 1901No. 3608PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Spokane County. — Hon. Leaetdee H. Peathek, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Reavis, C. J.

The complaint states that respondent is a municipal corporation; that in January, 1895, one R. A. Jones was constructing a water works system for respondent, by virtue of a contract then subsisting between Jones and respondent, known as the “Waterworks Contract;” that respondent had agreed to pay Jones about the sum of $355,000 for such work, to he paid in half monthly installments during the progress of the work; that on the 27th day of January, 1895, Jones made his order in writing as follows:

“Spokane, Washington, January 27, 1895.

To the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Grain v. AldrichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
  2. Hurlbutt v. N. W. Spaulding Saw Co.California Supreme Court · 1892
  3. City of Seattle v. LibermanWashington Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Surber v. KittengerWashington Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Robert Wise Plumbing & Heating, Inc. v. Alpine Development Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Mack Manufacturing Co. v. Smoot & Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1904
  3. Maitland v. PurdyWashington Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Palmer v. Oregon-Washington R. & Nav. Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1913
  5. Dickerson v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1904

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API