Legal Opinion
Gerson, Beesley & Hampton, Inc. v. Shubert Theatre Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 24, 1934PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CAFFEY, District Judge.
The facts are agreed on. Nevertheless, perhaps examination of what was said at the oral arguments would assist in understanding the situation (Minutes of March 39,1934, pp. 49-58, 72-77; Minutes of April 91,1934, pp. 98-105).
Additional corporation income taxes are owing to the United States. Without interest since they were assessed, these aggregate $85,590.99. Corporation franchise taxes are owing to the state of New York. Without interest included, these aggregate $67,014.-04.
The taxes due the United States were assessed against Shubert Theatre Corporation only…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Price v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- New York v. MacLaySupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Aspen Mining & Smelting Co. v. BillingsSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- County of Spokane v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Bienville Water Supply Co. v. MobileSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. City of GreenvilleCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1941
- In Re Knox-Powell-Stockton Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
- United States v. CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939