Legal Opinion

R. S. Mikesell Associates v. Grand River Dam Authority

District Court, E.D. Oklahoma

Decided November 9, 1977No. 77-251-CPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

DAUGHERTY, District Judge.

This is a breach of contract action in which it is asserted that the Court has subject matter jurisdiction by reason of diversity of citizenship and amount in controversy pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Defendant has filed herein an Objection to Venue and Motion to Transfer and a Brief in support thereof wherein Defendant asks the Court to transfer this action to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma. Plaintiff has filed a Response and supporting Brief opposing Defendant’s Motion.

In support of its Motion, Defendant contends that it…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Pure Oil Co. v. SuarezSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Miller v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974
  3. Sheldon v. Grand River Dam AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  4. Steel Motor Service, Inc. v. ZalkeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1954
  5. Lee v. HuntDistrict Court, M.D. Louisiana · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum Commission v. National Football LeagueDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1981
  2. Eddie Manley, Individually, and as Administratrix of the Estate of Shirley Hall v. Leve T. EngramCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API