Legal Opinion · Dissent

J. Brotton Corp. v. Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Laws Enforcement Commission

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 3, 1991No. 71526Published

1Dissent

KAUGER, Justice,

with whom OPALA, Chief Justice, and SIMMS, and DOOLIN, Justices, join, dissenting:

Although I might agree with the result reached by the majority opinion, I cannot concur in its legal definition of a “public school.” The majority assigns a meaning to “public schools” which contravenes the Oklahoma Constitution,1 the Oklahoma statutes,2 and Oklahoma case law.3

The majority opinion bases its determination that the term “public school” as used in 37 O.S.Supp. 1985 § 518.24 includes institutions for higher education on: 1) The ABLE Commission’s previously unchallenged rule which…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Oral Roberts University v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
  2. Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board v. MossSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973
  3. In Re Arbuckle Master Conservancy Dist, District Ct., Murray Cty., No 9660Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
  4. McCullick v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1984
  5. Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board v. MilamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API