Legal Opinion

Schultz v. Rudman

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 12, 1922No. Appeal, 127 and 196PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Porter, J.,

The judgments from which we have these appeals were entered upon warrants of attorney contained in promissory notes. The court below discharged rules to open the judgments and the defendant appeals. The questions presented in the appeals are identical, the cases were argued together, and may properly be disposed of by a single opinion.

The affidavits of the defendant, in the respective judgments, upon which the rules to open the judgments were entered, admitted the execution of the notes, but averred that they had been given as collateral to secure the plaintiff against…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cruzan v. HutchisonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
  2. Rowland v. ClarkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ferguson v. O'HaraSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  2. Landis v. Hoch Et Ux.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  3. Murray v. FlesherSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  4. Ritter v. Henry, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Mifflin County1932
  5. Snyder v. Arnold, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Montour County1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API