Legal Opinion

Beal-Burrow Dry Goods Co. v. Baker

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 16, 1929No. 18646Published

1Opinion of the Court

DIFEENDAEFER, C.

This is an action brought by Beal Burrow Dry Goods Company, plaintiff in error, herein referred to as plaintiff, against J. H. Baker, defendant in error, herein referred to as defendant, for the recovery of $1,097.08, claimed as a balance due upon a promissory note. The note was for the sum of $2,000. It was executed by Williams & Stone, a copartnership composed of R. E. Williams and J. H. Stone, who were engaged in business in Ft. Smith, Ark., and indorsed by J. H. Baker. The petition was in the usual form as to execution and indorsement of the note. Defendant answered…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Collier v. DavisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1886
  2. King v. Hargadine-McKittrick Dry Goods Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1894
  3. Aaronson v. DeutschUnited States Circuit Court · 1885
  4. Brown Shoe Company v. StoneSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
  5. Nelson v. HarperSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API