Legal Opinion

Perkins v. Conradi

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 10, 1998No. 95CV0538; CA A94839PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff moves for reconsideration of our opinion on reconsideration, 153 Or App 273, 956 P2d 1022 (1998). We allow the petition to reconsider. Footnote one is deleted from our previous opinion because it contains an erroneous statement of fact. The statement of fact was unrelated to our analysis. We adhere to our opinion as modified.

Petition for reconsideration allowed. Opinion modified and adhered to as modified.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Perkins v. ConradiCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. G. B. v. MoreyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  2. Ross Dress for Less, Inc. v. Makarios-Oregon, LLCDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2016