Legal Opinion

Basso v. Sunoco, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 23, 2006No. Nos. 1:00-1898, MDL 1358(SAS), M21-88PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

SCHEINDLIN, District Judge.

Plaintiffs seek relief from contamination, or threatened contamination, of groundwater from various defendants’ use of the gasoline additive methyl tertiary butyl ether (“MTBE”) and/or tertiary butyl alcohol (“TBA”), a product that is formed by the natural degradation of MTBE in water. On February 16, 2006, Sunoco, Inc. and Sunoco, Inc. (R & M) (“Sunoco”), defendants in the above-captioned actions, brought a third-party action against the Town of Highlands for indemnity and contribution alleging that MTBE and/or TBA and other contaminants…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cresswell v. Sullivan & CromwellCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
  2. Charles Glueck v. Jonathan Logan, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
  3. Board Of Education Of The City Of New York v. Ewald NyquistCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
  4. Fund of Funds, Ltd. v. Arthur Andersen & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
  5. United States v. Standard Oil CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1955

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re Methyl Tert. Butyl Ether Products Liab. Lit.District Court, S.D. New York · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API