Legal Opinion

Brukhman v. Giuliani

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 19, 1997PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Jane S. Solomon, J.

" 'A fair day’s wages for a fair day’s work’: it is as just a *29demand as governed men ever made of governing. It is the everlasting right of man.” (Carlyle, Past and Present, book I, ch 3.)1

This dispute centers on a claim by welfare recipients that they are not receiving fair economic credit for work they perform in exchange for their public assistance grants.

The named plaintiffs are recipients of Home Relief (HR)2 or Aid to Families with Dependent Children (ADC)3 who have been assigned to the Work Experience Program (WEP), under the aegis of the New York…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. W. T. Grant Co. v. SrogiNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Jones v. BermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Aetna Insurance v. CapassoNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Lehigh Portland Cement Co. v. New York State Department of Environmental ConservationNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Young v. ToiaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Brukhman v. GiulianiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  2. Enzian v. WingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API