City of New York v. McLain Lines, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
FRANK, Circuit Judge.
It is fairly obvious from the record, and it was conceded at the oral argument here, that the findings, filed a month after the oral opinion, were substantially those presented to the trial judge by the proctors for the barge-owner, the successful libellant. On the unfortunate and undesirable character of findings thus made we have often commented, calling attention to the importance of findings because they bind the upper courts unless clearly erroneous and because findings carefully made ensure a painstaking review of the evidence. One such comment, that in United…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. Crescent Amusement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. FornessCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
- Exner Sand & Gravel Corp. v. Eastern S. S. Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1938
3Cited by14 opinions
- LaTouraine Coffee Co. v. Lorraine Coffee Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
- The SeveranceCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1945
- Flora Mir Candy Corporation v. DicksonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
- McLain Lines, Inc. v. The Ann Marie TracyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
- Petition of Tracy the Mary T. TracyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.