Hayden v. Van Cortlandt
New York Supreme Court
Appeal from special term, Warren county. Action by Henry W. Hayden against Catharine E. Van Cortlandt to enjoin defendant from trespassing on the property claimed by plaintiff, and also to establish the boundary line between such property of plaintiff and defendant’s property. From an order allowing the discovery and inspection on the application of plaintiff of marks on a tree on defendant’s land, defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtPutnam, J.
This action was brought for the purpose of enjoining the defendant from trespassing on property which plaintiff claimed to own at Lake George, and to establish the boundary line between such property of the plaintiff and defendant’s premises. The answer of defendant alleges that she is the owner in fee of the property which plaintiff claims. On the 2d day of October, 1894, plaintiff, on a verified petition and affidavits, obtained an order from a judge of this court requiring defendant to allow plaintiff to make discovery and inspection of certain marks alleged to be on a tree on defendant’s…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Morrison v. SturgesThe Superior Court of New York City · 1863
- Pegram v. CarsonThe Superior Court of New York City · 1860
- Walker v. Granite BankNew York Supreme Court · 1865
- Mott v. Consumers' Ice Co.New York Court of Common Pleas · 1876
- Bien v. HellmanThe Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo · 1893
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re Kostohris' EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1934
- Howe's Cave Lime & Cement Co. v. Howe's Cave Ass'nNew York Supreme Court · 1895
- Groene v. KostohrisMontana Supreme Court · 1934