Legal Opinion

Phillips v. Wilmington & Philadelphia Traction Co.

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided February 7, 1922No. Sums, case, No. 92PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rice, J.,

delivering the opinion of the Court:

Counsel for the defendant argued with great earnestness that the Court had improperly admitted the X-ray photograph *594taken in Baltimore by Doctor Evans, without Doctor Evans being present to testify concerning such photograph. Doctor Phillips, a witness for the plaintiff, testified that he was a practicing physician and was present when Doctor Evans took the X-ray photograph of plaintiff; that he assisted in arranging him in position and went with Doctor Evans to the room where the plate was developed and was present while it was being developed;…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. MathesonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
  2. Prescott & Northwestern Railroad v. FranksSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1914

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Reinhold v. SpencerIdaho Supreme Court · 1933
  2. O'Neill v. CoolesSuperior Court of Delaware · 1928
  3. Howell v. GeorgeMississippi Supreme Court · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API