Legal Opinion

Brunswick v. Hurley

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 21, 1907No. Gen. No. 12,957PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Judgment by confession. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. Merritt W. Pinckney, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holdom

The relation of physician and patient existed between the parties at the time of the transaction in controversy. Mrs. Brunswick, with her husband, went to the office of Dr. Hurley for treatment in October, 1905. A physical examination of Mrs. Brunswick by the doctor, at that time, disclosed that she was suffering from chronic endometritis with complications. In accepting Mrs. Brunswick as a patient for treatment, Dr. Hurley informed her that a surgical operation was necessary in order to effect a permanent cure, but consented to try and effect a cure without resorting to surgery. For a time…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. North Chicago Street Railway Co. v. CottonIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Mumford v. TolmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Williams v. PeopleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1886
  4. Goergen v. SchmidtAppellate Court of Illinois · 1897
  5. Mumford v. TolmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1894

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Beckers v. City of KankakeeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1919
  2. Koehler v. GlaumAppellate Court of Illinois · 1912
  3. Bird v. TrenchAppellate Court of Illinois · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API