Crane Company of Minnesota v. Commissioner
United States Tax Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION.
Harron, Judge:
The petitioner claims relief from excess profits tax under the provisions of Code sections 722 (a) and 722 (b) (2), (b) (3) (A),(b) (3) (B),and (b) (5).
The claim in this proceeding is for relief from excess profits tax for 1941. The years 1940 and 1942 are also involved because petitioner claims unused constructive excess profits credit carryover and carry-back.
Petitioner’s chief contention is that it meets all of the qualifying factors set forth in section 722 (b) (3) (A). Petitioner contends also that it qualifies for relief under subsections (b) (3) (B), (b). (2), and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Avey Drilling Machine Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1951
- Granite Constr. Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1952
- Harlan Bourbon & Wine Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1950
- Foskett & Bishop Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1951
- Toledo Stove & Range Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1951
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Crane Co. of Minnesota v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1956