Legal Opinion

People v. Licalsi

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 6, 1929No. Docket No. 1788PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHouser, J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment of " conviction of the crime of grand theft and from an order denying his motion for a new trial.

By the information it was charged that defendant stole a diamond ring of the value of $500. Appellant presents the point that before defendant could be convicted of grand theft the burden devolved on the prosecution to prove that the value of the ring exceeded the sum of $200. (Sec. 487, Pen. Code.) With reference thereto, in substance, the evidence showed that the ring was set in platinum and weighed 1.35 carats. The only evidence as to the value of the ring was…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. NagyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. LeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  2. People v. HendersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API