Legal Opinion

State v. S. T. (In re S.T.)

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 7, 2018No. A165844PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHadlock, P. J.

*684Appellant seeks reversal of an order that continues his commitment to the Oregon Health Authority (OHA) for an additional period not to exceed 180 days. The order is based solely on a determination that appellant's mental disorder has left him unable to provide for his basic needs out-side a hospital setting; the court found that the state did not prove that appellant is dangerous to himself or others. On appeal, appellant contends that the record does not support a determination that his mental disorder leaves him unable to provide for his basic needs. We agree and, accordingly, reverse.1

A…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. M. B.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  2. State v. C. M. C.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  3. State v. M. C. D.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  4. State v. J. B.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
  5. State v. J. B.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API