Legal Opinion

Fajen v. Powlus

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 7, 1977No. 12071PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHEPARD, Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment decreeing a forfeiture of a contract vendee’s interest in real estate and also from the denial of a motion to file a counterclaim for specific performance of that contract. We reverse.

This is the second appeal by these same parties and many of the facts and circumstances are set out in our earlier opinion. See, Fajen v. Powlus, 96 Idaho 625, 533 P.2d 746 (1975) (hereinafter “Fajen I”).

Samuel B. (now deceased) and Lucille E. Smith were the owners of Lots 2, 3 and 4 of Woods Addition in Twin Falls, and on April 20, 1969, they entered into an…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Stockmen's Supply Co. v. JenneIdaho Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Sullivan v. BurcawIdaho Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Bell v. StadlerIdaho Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Fajen v. PowlusIdaho Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Anderton v. WaddellIdaho Supreme Court · 1963

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Ellis v. ButterfieldIdaho Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Brown v. Yacht Club of Coeur D'Alene, Ltd.Idaho Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Barnard & Son, Inc. v. AkinsIdaho Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Kugler v. Northwest Aviation, Inc.Idaho Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. Cox v. Mountain Vistas, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1981

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API