Legal Opinion

Hogan Finance & Mortgage Co. v. Mead

California Supreme Court

Decided August 8, 1928No. Docket No. L.A. 9495PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.

This is an appeal by the plaintiff from a judgment in favor of the defendant, C. S. Mead, on his cross-complaint in an action in claim and delivery.

The defendant and cross-complainant was a distributor of Chevrolet automobiles in Pasadena. One I. H. Weaver was a retail automobile dealer located at San Gabriel. The plaintiff was engaged, among other activities, in purchasing and financing contracts for the purchase of automobiles, dealing directly with automobile dealers. Weaver entered into an agreement with Mead to handle Chevrolet ears at San Gabriel. Under this agreement Weaver received…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Metropolitan Finance Corp. v. MorfCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  2. Nathan v. American Photoplayer Co.California Court of Appeal · 1928
  3. Stampfli v. Susanville Sanitary DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API