Legal Opinion

City of New York v. Consolidated Edison Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 4, 1993PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Alice Schlesinger, J.), entered on or about September 8, 1992, which, inter alia, granted defendant’s cross-motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The City is not entitled to indemnification from Con Ed; since the jury apportioned 40% of the fault against the City, common law indemnification is inapplicable (see, D’Ambrosio v City of New York, 55 NY2d 454). Also, contrary to the City’s claim, Administrative Code of the City of New York § 19-107 does not provide for…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. D'Ambrosio v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Petrucci v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Corwin v. NYC Bike Share, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017
  2. Libardi v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  3. Baczyk v. Park 25th AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API