General Instrument Corp. v. American Home Assurance Co.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
BECHTLE, District Judge.
Before the Court is defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Resolution of the motion depends upon the interpretation to be given a limitation of action clause contained in the insurance contract upon which this diversity suit is based.
Unlike the meaning of the clause in question, the facts relevant to a determination of the motion are both clear and undisputed. On January 14, 1971, defendant executed Special Floater Policy No. IF4664731 which, effective April 14, 1971,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Mohn v. American Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Blocker v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Bass v. Standard Acc. Ins. Co. of DetroitCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1934
- Parke v. Pennsylvania Threshermen & Farmers Mutual Casualty Ins.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Patitucci v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1959
3Cited by5 opinions
- Atwood v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Ins. Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2006
- Salcedo v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1998
- Graingrowers Warehouse Co. v. Central National Insurance Co. of OmahaDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 1989
- Brown v. Bellaplast MaschinenbauDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1985
- Atwood v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2006