Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Callon Petroleum Company v. Big Chief Drilling Company, Defendant-Third-Party v. William R. Stanley, Defendant-Third-Party

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided April 27, 1977No. 74-4172Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partColeman, Circuit Judge

The chief adversaries in this oil well drilling breach of contract controversy are Callón Petroleum Company (Callón), which contracted to have the well drilled, and Big Chief Drilling Company (Big Chief), which agreed to drill it. The respective parties were bound by a written contract but for a time Callón exercised little or no diligence to see that it was receiving what it had *1181contracted for. Through its drilling chief, Big Chief knew very well that it was not drilling where it had contracted to drill.

Callón found an undrilled tract in the North lh of the Northwest Vi, Section 23, Township…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. The Boeing Company v. Daniel C. ShipmanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  2. Dependents of Dawson v. Delta Western Exploration Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Austin v. Gulf States Finance CompanyMississippi Supreme Court · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API