Legal Opinion
Heilman v. Heilman
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided April 9, 1992No. 78502PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
596 So.2d 1046 (1992)
David L. HEILMAN, Petitioner,
v.
Barbara Ann HEILMAN, Respondent.
No. 78502.
Supreme Court of Florida.
April 9, 1992.
Stephen L. Cook, Jupiter, for petitioner.
Raymond M. Masciarella II, North Palm Beach, for respondent.
OVERTON, Justice.
We have for review Heilman v. Heilman, 583 So.2d 442 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991), in which the district court certified the following question as being of great public importance:
IS THE CONSENT OF BOTH PARTIES REQUIRED BEFORE A CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT ISSUE MAY BE REFERRED TO A HEARING OFFICER UNDER RULE 1.491, FLORIDA RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE?
Id. at…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Slattery v. SlatteryDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
- Oliveri v. OliveriDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
- In re Florida Rules of Civil ProcedureSupreme Court of Florida · 1987
- Heilman v. HeilmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
- In re Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.491Supreme Court of Florida · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Gregory v. RiceSupreme Court of Florida · 1999
- Chattic v. BrooksDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
- Cozza v. GerstenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
- Jesmer v. DorsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992