In re Mortgage Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1DissentDore, J.
The issue is the proper construction and interpretation of that part of section 1077-c of the Civil Practice Act which permits the court to make an order directing payment of the “ surplus or such part thereof as the court may determine to the mortgagee to apply toward the reduction of any past due principal.” It is now said that means the court must direct payment to the mortgagee of all surplus in any application unless part is necessary for prospective expenses, taxes, interest or carrying charges, or for the maintenance and preservation of the mortgaged property. The statute itself…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Mortgage Corp. v. Menan Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
- Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. v. 42 Broadway Realty Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1939