Hennen v. Hennen
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Eastern Dist. APPEAL FROM THE COUP.T OF TIIE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT. This is an action to annul and set aside an account and a notarial act, as having been ratified and signed by the plaintiff, through error, &c., and that the defendant be required to render a new account of his administration as tutor, and pay over a large sum which is alleged will be due on a full settlement.
Read the full summary
Eastern Dist. APPEAL FROM THE COUP.T OF TIIE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT. This is an action to annul and set aside an account and a notarial act, as having been ratified and signed by the plaintiff, through error, &c., and that the defendant be required to render a new account of his administration as tutor, and pay over a large sum which is alleged will be due on a full settlement. The defendant being sued as a resident of the city and parish of New-Orleans, pleaded a declinatory exception, averring, that his legal domicil was in the parish of St. Tammany, in which place alone he was suable. .…
1Opinion of the CourtCarleton, J.
At the trial of this cause, our attention was first drawn to the declinatory exception taken by the defendant, who insists that his domicil is in the parish of St. Tammany, and that he is not suable in the parish of Orleans.
The exception is as follows:
“ And now the said Alfred Hennen appears and makes a declinatory exception to the jurisdiction of this honorable court, and says, that he is a resident of the parish of St. Tammany and therein domiciliated, and cáñ be sued in the parish *192of St. Tammany, his legal residence, only; and that he is not ]¡able to be sued in the parish of Orleans, and…
2Cited by12 opinions
- Zinko v. ZinkoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1943
- Barrow v. BarrowSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
- Dupre v. Rochester Ropes, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1968
- Burgan v. BurganSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1945
- A. B. Ausbacher & Co. v. De NevueSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1893
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.