State v. Pointer
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
STEELMAN, Judge.
Defendant appeals two convictions of assault with a deadly weapon with intent to kill inflicting serious injury because he asserts that he did not have the ability to form the intent to kill. For the reasons stated herein, we find no prejudicial error.
Factual Background
The State’s evidence tended to show that Kimberly Rogers (“Rogers”) invited her brother, Roger Allen Pointer (“defendant”), to live with her in Lincolnton, North Carolina in 2002. Rogers lived with her three children: Seth, age sixteen; Karissa, age thirteen; and, Tiffany, age twelve. It was agreed that…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- State v. PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- State v. BarnesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
- State v. VauseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
- State v. AsheSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- State v. TiradoSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2004
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. Corey TownsendCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2018
- State v. StarrCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
- State v. IronsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
- State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
- State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011