Finley v. Nelton
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCurrie, J.
In order to determine whether Ruth Finley and Donald Finley possessed the right to appeal from the final order of the juvenile court it is necessary to analyze the statutes, under which the proceedings in juvenile court were instituted and carried on, as well as the particular subsection conferring the right of appeal. This is so because sub. (8) of sec. 48.07, Stats., provides for the taking of an appeal without specifying who may do so.
The statute governing the institution of the proceedings is sec. 48.06 (1), Stats., and provides that which the petition must contain, and among other things…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- McNamara v. McNamaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Commonwealth v. KitchenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
- Boudinier v. BoudinierMissouri Court of Appeals · 1947
- Pierson v. PiersonWashington Supreme Court · 1923
- James v. FishWisconsin Supreme Court · 1945
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Ginn v. Superior Court, in and for County of PimaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
- State Ex Rel. Lewis v. Lutheran Social ServicesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
- Ventresco v. BusheySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1963
- In the Matter of the Guardianship of CNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
- In re Brenda H.Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court · 1973
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.