Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Thurman v. Pratte

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 9, 2010No. ED 95387PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

NANNETTE A. BAKER, Presiding Judge.

Introduction

Jeffrey Thurman (“Relator”) filed a petition for a writ of prohibition or in the alternative, a writ of mandamus to prohibit the Honorable Kenneth W. Pratte (“Respondent”) from ordering that Relator submit to a mental examination by the State. The issue before this court is whether Respondent has the authority to order a mental examination of Relator regarding his mental state at the time of the alleged criminal conduct after Relator disclosed an expert report concluding that he is mentally retarded. We issued a preliminary writ in prohibition.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. WhitfieldSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
  2. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 2008
  3. State Ex Rel. Unnerstall Ex Rel. Leighton v. BerkemeyerSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
  4. STATE EX REL. MISSOURI PUBLIC DEFENDER COMM'N. v. PratteSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
  5. State Ex Rel. Proctor v. BrysonSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Christopher Sandknop, Relator v. Honorable Steven H. Goldman, Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Missouri and Department of CorrectionsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API