Batts v. Bedingfield
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Wyatt, Justice.
1. The evidence as to the issue in the case was'in sharp conflict. The jury having resolved the issue of fact in favor of the defendant, it follows as a matter of course that there is no merit in the general grounds of the motion for new trial.
2. The amendment to the motion for new trial contains 7 grounds and consists of 20 pages, attacking the charge of the court. We believe that it would serve no useful purpose to repeat here the language of this lengthy instrument. We will simply pass upon the legal questions raised.
Complaint is made that the court in the charge to the jury…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Pickens v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
- Pye v. PyeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
- Phillips v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
- Ricketson v. RicketsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
3Cited by5 opinions
- Clough v. Greyhound CorporationCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954
- Murphy v. FullerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
- Cowart v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1959
- Darby v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956
- Clough v. Greyhound CorporationCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954