Legal Opinion

Hoyt v. Hoyt

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 18, 1984No. AV-380PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILLS, Judge.

Freda Hoyt, former wife of Max Hoyt, appeals from an order of the trial court setting out Max’s obligation to pay ownership expenses on the former marital home. Freda contends the trial court erred in not requiring Max to reimburse her for one-half of the mortgage interest payments made by her during her exclusive use and possession of the home. We agree, modify the order, and affirm it as modified.

The parties were divorced in 1975. At that time, Freda was awarded exclusive use and possession of the former marital home during the minority of the children. She was required to pay…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lyons v. LyonsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968
  2. Price v. PriceDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  3. Adkins v. EdwardsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
  4. Guthrie v. GuthrieDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
  5. Kohn v. KohnDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Donsky-Levine v. LevineDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  2. Poole v. SavageDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  3. Tanner v. DuganDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  4. Blackburn v. WissnerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
  5. Diego Alejandro Levinas v. Patricia Marnie Gluck LevinasDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2025

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API